2018B14 Describe the factors determining transdermal uptake of drugs (50%).
Briefly outline the advantages and disadvantages of this route.

 

List:

·      Intro

·      Factors increasing rate of uptake

·      Logistics: pros and cons

·      Kinetics: pros and cons

 

Intro:

Definition

Absorbed through the skin

Path of drug

Patch -> epidermis -> dermis -> blood vessel

Multiple lipid membranes

Locally acting

Lignocaine/prilocaine, amethocaine

Systemically acting

Fentanyl, buprenorphine, GTN, nicotine

 

Factors increasing rate of uptake:

Fick’s law of diffusion

↑C1

e.g. lignocaine 2% cf. 1%

e.g. EMLA eutectic mix 1:1 -> mutual liquid dissolution -> allows high concentration (2.5% ea)

↓C2

↑Tissue blood flow rate

(note slow if hypovolaemia, hypothermia)

↑Area

↑Patch area

↓Thickness

Flexor skin (e.g. abdomen) cf. extensor skin (back)

(note epidermis 0.5centimetre cf. lung 0.5micrometre)

↑Lipid solubility

e.g. fentanyl 600x morphine 1x

↓Molecular weight

The ‘500 Dalton rule’

e.g. amethocaine 264 Da

↑%Unionised

e.g. amethocaine: 40%, highest of all local anaesthetics

e.g. EMLA: added OH -> ↑pH -> ↑%unionised lignocaine and prilocaine

 

Logistics:

Pros

Cons

Painless

Risk of inadvertent removal

Non-invasive

Often hidden

Convenient

Risk of adverse reaction to carrier

 

Pharmacokinetics:

Pros

Cons

Not reliant on gut absorption

Slow and variable onset, long time to peak effect

Risk of dose stacking and toxicity

e.g. >24 hours for fentanyl

No first pass hepatic metabolism

Slow offset -> long duration of toxicity

(e.g. >24h for fentanyl)

High bioavailability

e.g. GTN near 100% cf. oral near 0%

 

Constant plasma concentration once at steady state

Quasi IV infusion

 

Slow offset -> infrequent dosing

e.g. buprenorphine 7 days

 

 

 

Feedback welcome at ketaminenightmares@gmail.com